Emergency extends as another appointed authority recuses himself

Emergency extends as another appointed authority recuses himself


Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, another Supreme Court judge, has removed himself from the larger bench that is hearing the case regarding the delay in provincial assembly elections, escalating the situation even further.

The lawyers questioned the legal proceedings in which voices were raised regarding the postponement of provincial assembly elections within the Supreme Court.

The following week would be crucial in the current situation, which also includes conflict within the SC.

The SC enlistment center held a round on Friday, ignoring the legal requests of the two adjudicators, in which it was decided that all cases under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution should not be made public until changes are made to the SC Rules 1980 regarding the CJP’s optional powers to shape exceptional seats. This was a terrible development.

Now, the question of whether the CJP’s administrative order could overrule a judicial decision came up.

The question of the circular remained the topic of discussion. It was anticipated that some of the SC judges would strongly oppose the move in the coming days.

Instead of ignoring the administrative aspect, a lawyer stated that the bench “should have suspended the order for the time being.”

He stated that the SC registrar’s issuance of the circular could result in contempt. However, the following week would be even more significant with regard to the SC’s current situation.

Hasan Raza Pasha, chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council Executive Committee, urged the CJP to convene a full court meeting to discuss the situation in light of the circular and Justice Mandokhail’s recusal.

Read, the dissolution of the bench has no effect: Imran, on the other hand, the chief justice stated that plans were being made to convene a full court meeting within a few days.

However, it was discovered that the SC’s high temperature made judges on both sides less likely to meet to discuss specific issues.

A lawyer stated, “The CJP should have consulted the judges before issuance of the circular.”

The most over the top upsetting thing was that Value Mandokhail in his legitimate note concerning his recusal said that three adjudicators – explicitly CJP Bandial, Value Ijaz ul Ahsan, and Value Munib Akhtar – coordinated the solicitation in his nonappearance and without contacting him for collaboration in the contemplations.

“I felt that the three learned members of the bench, for reasons best known to them, opted not to involve me in the consultation,” according to the note.

The order also showed the division among the SC judges.

During the hearing on Friday, it was shown that CJP Bandial had made it abundantly clear to the establishment and executive authorities that elections for provincial assemblies “will be held, come what may,” which was a very important message.

In a similar vein, he was supporting Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, who was experiencing difficulties as a result of the allegations of misconduct that had been leveled against him.

CJP Bandial claimed that there was a silent method of communicating with the outside world when he explained why Justice Naqvi was added to the nine-member larger bench.

Additionally, Justice Bandial stated that, in accordance with the Provisional Constitutional Order of November 3, 2007, he was the only remaining superior court judge who had been removed for not taking an oath.

He claimed that his subsequent reinstatement as an appointed authority of the Lahore High Court was astonishment.

Continue reading Justice Bandial addressed the establishment for the first time during the hearing. CJP Bandial denies AGP Awan’s request for a full court in the polls delay case.

He was curious as to why the country’s armed forces were not providing security after 20 years of terrorism.

Additionally, CJP Bandial made it abundantly clear that they would directly investigate the cause of the election security deficit.

The CJP then asked for the AGP and defense secretary to appear in front of the bench on Monday.

That’s what he said: chief specialists would face results if the SC’s request for the holding of general decisions was not fulfilled.

Whether a divided Supreme Court could compel the military to provide election security was up for debate.

A PML-N attorney, on the other hand, stated that the CJP’s remarks reflected his resentment at being omitted from the court.

Despite the fact that every segment of society, as well as individual appointed authorities, legal counselors, and ideological groups, including the candidate party PTI, had no objection to the constitution of a full court, the seat hesitated without providing a valid explanation.

CJP Bandial also admitted that the Supreme Court was divided following the presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s filing.

He stated that Justice Isa and the Supreme Court went through difficult times for two years.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) was of the opinion that Justice Naqvi’s complaint was a tax issue that required the attention of the tax authorities. However, a lawyer stated, “If charges against Justice Naqvi are false, the CJP should place his matter before the Supreme Judicial Council for his exoneration.”

It was interesting that a bench of three judges headed by CJP Bandial did not investigate whether the petitioner, PTI, brought the case to the Supreme Court with malicious intent.

It was suggested that the constitutional institutions might not function properly following the passage of the resolution of no confidence against former prime minister Imran Khan. After Imran was removed, the PTI left the Public Gathering. After that, they dissolved neither of the provincial assemblies, offering no justification for their actions.



About Tanveer zia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *